by Henry S. Tenedero (Manila Bulletin)
It was always been a dilemma for an educator to analyze the way he teaches his class, "Am I being as effective as I want to be a as a teacher?" Honestly, you don't have to ask yourself if you know the basic questions in a child's learning that is, "How do my students learn as exclusive and unique entities?" Perhaps after reading this article you would actually consider yourself not a teacher but a medium for your students' distinct learning style.
The research on learning styles explains why, in the same family, certain children perform well in school whereas their siblings do not. It demonstrates the differences in style among members of the same class, culture, community, profession, or socioeconomic group, but it also reveals the differences and similarities between groups. It shows how boys' styles differ from girls' and the differences between youngsters who learn to read easily and poorly. However, more important than the documentation of how conventional schooling responds to certain youngsters and inhibits the achievement of others, the research on learning styles provides clear directions for either how to teach individuals through their styles or how to teach them to teach themselves by capitalizing on their personal strengths.
Everybody has strengths, although parent's strengths tend to differ from each other's, from their children, and from their own parents'. Thus, mothers and fathers often learn differently from each other and from their children. However, a common parental practice is to insist that children study and do their homework as those adults did when they were young. That is not likely to be effective for at least some of the siblings because, in the same family, members usually learn in diametrically opposite ways.
UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE
The terms analytic/global, left/right, sequential/simultaneous, and inductive deductive have been used interchangeably and tend to parallel each other. Analytics learn more easily when information is presented step-by-step in a cumulative sequential pattern that builds toward a conceptual understanding.
Globals learn more easily when they either understand the concept first and they can concentrate on the details, or when they are introduced to the information with, preferably, a humorous story replete with examples and graphics. However, what is crucial to understanding brain functioning, is that both types reason, but by different strategies. Thus, whether youngsters are analytic or global, left or right, sequential or simultaneous, or inductive or deductive processors they are capable of mastering identical in formation or skills if they are taught through instructional methods or resources that complement their styles. Processing style appears to change; the majority of elementary school children are global. However, the older children get, and the longer they remain in school, the more analytic some become.
DIFFERENT STYLES, DIFFERENT NEEDS
What is fascinating is that analytic and global youngsters appear to have different environmental and physiological needs. Many analytics tend to prefer leaning in a quiet, well-illuminated, formal setting; they often have a strong emotional need to complete the tasks they are working on, and they rarely eat, drink, smoke, chew, or bite on objects while learning.
Conversely, globals appear to work with what teachers describe as distractors; they concentrate better with sound (music or background talking), soft lighting, an informal seating arrangement, and some form of intake. In addition, globals take frequent breaks while studying and often prefer to work on several tasks simultaneously. They begin something, stay with it for a short amount of time, stop, do something else, and eventually return to the original assignment.
Neither set of procedures is either better or worse than the other, they merely are different. Globals often prefer learning with their peers rather than either alone or with their teacher, and also often prefer to structure tasks in their own way; they tend to dislike imposed directives. What is interesting is that, with an IQ of 145 or higher, most gifted children are global. On the other hand most underachievers also are global. The difference between the high IQ and underachieving global students tend to be motivation and perceptual preferences.
It is understandable why the motivation levels of underachievers are lower than those of achievers, but what may separate the two groups is the biological development of their auditory, visual, tactual, and kinesthetic senses. Although we currently do not know how to intervene in their biological development, learning styles have been successful in teaching them through their existing perceptual preferences.
WHAT TEACHERS NEED TO KNOWNo doubt, teachers need to learn how to teach both analytically and globally. There are several easy-to-follow sources for learning how to do that. However, global students often require a different environment from the conventional classroom. They also appear to need more encouragement and short, varied tasks because of their lesser motivation and persistence levels.
Most children learn more easily when lessons are interesting to them, but globals require that new and difficult information be interesting , related to their lives, and permit active involvement. These are requirements for all youngsters; without doubt, they are necessary if globals are to master school requirements.